Nothing is dismissed in this debate.
One can look at another international model, AREVA, which is a large French company. It has a company that does mining and so forth, but it also builds and services reactors. The research is done by the Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique, which is sort of a parent company but really operates very much at arm's length. They have a relationship between the two. The Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique does research for a number of other parties and part of it is done for the commercial arm of the company.
There are different ways to go about this. Our sense right now is that it would be clear to have two entities with more focused mandates and clear accountabilities.