You say “diminishment of what AECL was”. I think you're correctly observing at this time that it is not participating in any of the new builds. So starting from where we are now, we have to be realistic about the prospects under the current structure.
As a large measure of the exercise, I cited the three objectives, the third one of which is really to position the industry to be more present in those markets and to enhance that capacity. If the government, upon seeing what is offered from potential investors, doesn't see that this results in more business and more activity and a better future for our nuclear industry than status quo, I would imagine it just won't go forward at that time.