Thanks, Mr. Chairman.
Thanks to all of you for being here.
I have just one question, then. We had testimony the other day on the technological shortcomings of the CANDU ACR reactor with respect to the negative power coefficient and inherent shortcomings that would make it not only difficult to use, given the arguments, but, in an engineering capacity, unsafe.
Without having heard that testimony, I guess it's difficult for you to reply, but generally from an engineering perspective, on the CANDU technology, we had the MAPLE issue, which seems to be proof of some sort that there are technology issues that have not been met. What's your response to that? I think the committee would like to know and have a comfort level.
We're talking about Canadian technology against the platform that exists. We don't want to underestimate or minimize that platform in any way, but if we're internationally developing a technology against the arguments that have been used, what's the likelihood that we'll have success if it's not a safe technology?