Again, it would come back to your public policy goals. If you decided that you wanted to just have an isotope supply sufficient for the country, it's likely that you could a build a reactor in Chalk River that could serve that supply. If you wanted to optimize the reactor at Chalk River--again, depending again on your strategy with AECL--and optimize it more toward nuclear power R and D, let's say, it may be that you also might chose a portfolio approach where you have another reactor that's more focused on the isotope business and neutron scattering.
On November 4th, 2009. See this statement in context.