Thank you.
In Canada's policy on long-term used fuel management, the end point is to store that used fuel in an unreprocessed form in a deep geologic repository where it could be retrieved if necessary.
The majority of other countries with nuclear power plants are not reprocessing. Historically they were. For instance, Sweden, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom all utilized reprocessing. Since then, they've pulled out of that, mainly because the cost is prohibitive.
However, France is still reprocessing, for a number of reasons. Some would say they are economic, while others would say they're for security of supply reasons. Nevertheless, they are reprocessing. They require a deep geologic repository. It's in their national policy to (a) reprocess and (b) store the vitrified high-level waste, which is one of the products of reprocessing, in a deep geologic repository.
I have to reiterate my remark that in using existing technology on reprocessing there is no significant--in our viewpoint--waste management benefit alone from reprocessing. It really is an economic security of supply issue that has proliferation issues connected to it with existing technology.