I hesitate to dive into the “surprise” word debate, but in a sense, what I would say is our attention at the time the decisions were made with respect to the December announcement, frankly, was focused on the continuity of isotope supply. When we were concentrating our attention on what messages we wanted to send, that was foremost in our mind. So I would say that, consistent with what was said earlier, we treated this matter as one where there was no safety exposure, no risk to the public, and therefore we did not make an explicit comment on that in our press releases.
On February 24th, 2009. See this statement in context.