It seems to me that there is an aspect of unlimited liability that can actually remove the responsibility from the operators if they find themselves in a situation in which nothing but the value of the plant is left. The liability comes back to that. There's no value there beyond the plant, and they have no responsibility beyond that, whereas this requires them to carry $650 million in insurance and will cover, according to the work that's been done, virtually any situation that would take place.
On November 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.