I think another implication he made was that they're basically free to create unlimited damage as well through this. My question to you is, would you be insuring them if you believed that was the case?
November 18th, 2009 / 5:20 p.m.
Conservative
David Anderson Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK
I think another implication he made was that they're basically free to create unlimited damage as well through this. My question to you is, would you be insuring them if you believed that was the case?
See context to find out what was said next.