There was a suggestion from the witness, who was on by teleconference in the first session, that in his view if this bill passed, it, or the existing law, would be struck aside in the event of an accident on the basis of security to the person. Under the charter, someone who was claiming the level was too low and was seeking to exceed that level of damages, perhaps in a class action suit, could set aside this law. Do you have a view on that?
