Energy Probe and our co-plaintiffs pursued a number of avenues under sections 7 and 15 of the charter. They had to do with the security of the person, that in taking away normal incentives for safety, the existing act and its successor violate that part of the charter. That's one line of argument.
There are a number of lines of argumentation under which limiting liability and limiting compensation amounts would be seen as violating the charter rights of victims. We lost that case in large part, I would say, because our arguments were seen as theoretical and academic and what if. After an accident, they would not be seen as theoretical or academic or what if; they would be all too real.