That is correct. The point of the bill is that the operator not be able to make a claim against this insurance to compensate himself for his own damage. So damage to the operator's own installation is carved out of the bill, which means, since it's completely out, that normal contract and tort law applies to that installation, and that's out of the consideration of this bill altogether.
Then, when we get to the question of compensating that operator's employees, we have a future provision of the bill, clause 28, which clarifies that for whatever arrangements he has going, workers' compensation or insurance arrangements or whatever, they are not cancelled by anything else in the bill. Clause 16 is intending to and does cover losses of somebody other than the operator and covers the losses of somebody other than the operator's employees.
I'm sorry. I was confused about that. It's been a while since I thought about it.