I think our rationale was that we understood that the act would not address a severe accident in terms of the liability limit. The legislation addresses any kind of an accident that would happen, but in terms of the liability limit, we set an amount that was based on an international standard and reflected insurance capacity and other parameters. We looked at what a foreseeable incident was and how the impacts associated with a foreseeable incident would relate to the $650 million limit.
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.