Okay. And I want to get to that court versus tribunal scenario because I think it's important, but I'll wait until it's there.
I'm confused. In the scenario you just described, let's say somebody shows up with.... I'm imagining subclause 16(2) not being here. If someone shows up with compensable damages, or a whole bunch of people show up, they eat up $500 million in damages right off the bat. The next person in line, or the next group of people in line, let's say, were more directly impacted and that went another $500 million. A judge has this law in front of him and knows there's more money to get. And Parliament can provide more money. A judge isn't going to say, “Well, for all you folks coming next in line, there's only $150 million. We're just going have to figure out the rest.”
Are judges limited under subclause 16(2) or under any part of this bill—I don't think they are—to only find $650 million worth of damages? That's not imagined. Correct?