I understand that's the assumption you made, but the folks, the report writers, who did this study for you to assess the effects of nuclear accidents, the economic loss that might be incurred by a person, what we're studying in clause 15, told the CNSC, and through the CNSC to the government, that they should also do a study and analyze the effect of a “severe” accident. I don't understand why the government wouldn't do that.
Why maintain the assumption of a limited or small-scale accident? The report writers themselves said, that's fine, we've done this for you, this is where we think the limits should be, but you also must consider a severe accident, and yet the government doesn't go through with that consideration.