So my question is that under this clause of this bill, such a similar settlement is exempted because the government, when drawing this up, tried to make a tighter loop around who could make claim for psychological damage. In the Three Mile Island incident the class action that went ahead—and I forget the figure, but it was quite significant in the end—was to help people move, primarily. That is not foreseeable in this bill. Am I right?
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.