In any accident, severe or otherwise, one can anticipate the contamination of soil and water.
Clause 16 talks about the loss of property. If I'm looking at a site like Pickering, some 30 kilometres outside of Toronto, I'm looking again to understand why $650 million is going to cover off the contamination of a major body of water like Lake Ontario and how the department came up with the confidence to say that that's okay. I mean, just the property value alone....
You talked earlier about a contamination that is...are both controlled and uncontrolled releases anticipated here as well?
I know Chalk River is different. You've made mention that it's different--maybe not different, but it's a scenario you're not familiar with; you're dealing with electricity production.