Thank you.
Regarding the first question, in terms of the amendment, yes, I believe that in fact the amendment would open up the legislation by requiring the courts to determine if these measures were reasonable. Our view was that it was best to provide some rigour into the determination of what remedial measures were, and that's why we introduced the concept of federal or provincial competent authorities into the legislation.
In answer to the second question, this provision does not exist in the existing legislation, the Nuclear Liability Act. It was introduced for the very reason that the Nuclear Liability Act was brought into force in the 1970s when there was very little concern about the environment or environmental damage. This really addresses the fact that there could be damages to public lands and that it was appropriate that there be something in place ahead of there being any damage here, so that the mitigation of that damage could be compensated. This provision would also bring Canadian legislation up to the standard of some of the international conventions in this area as well.