In the case of clause 17, if a tribunal were created, the tribunal could set priorities. It could say, we're going to put environment third; we're going to put all health matters and concerns first, economic losses second, and then we'll get to environmental cleanup damages.
Just so I have this right, this is paying compensation to folks who have already gone forward and done cleanup? You referenced earlier, Mr. McCauley, people getting compensated for the cleanup that they had done. I'm paraphrasing what you said. Is that what clause 17 deals with?