The authors of the study that the CNSC commissioned said that when you're looking at these issues of compensation, what the liability regime should be, the government should also go down and look at places like Pickering, with a much higher density—and not just much higher density right around the facility itself but a near proximity to a very large population like Toronto. The evacuation costs associated with Pickering and potentially, if it were a bad incident.... Again, this isn't me, these are the authors of the report who are saying you need to look at this. I don't understand why in clause 18, then, the government didn't try to limit the liability further.
