If I'm an owner of a hotel operating in the immediate vicinity; I'm compensated for my hotel having been evacuated and for the week the evacuation order remained in effect. But it's not difficult to imagine that the number of bookings going into that hotel would be greatly reduced in the months following a nuclear accident, as they were after an incident like SARS. Is that imagined under this clause, that someone would come forward to the tribunal and say, my hotel typically experienced 60% higher...or my restaurant, or whatever business in the affected vicinity? I'm not talking about somebody 100 miles down the road saying they feel they've been damage by this, but somebody in the immediate area.
I just want to know what the government is liable for. I want to know what the nuclear providers are liable for. Are they liable for something like that?