So the city or whoever slaps up a barrier could never be seen as being liable for any damages somebody sought, because they were doing it under authority. Any claim for damages would have to go further up the pipe. Is that correct?
Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
So the city or whoever slaps up a barrier could never be seen as being liable for any damages somebody sought, because they were doing it under authority. Any claim for damages would have to go further up the pipe. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.