Clause 17 can't be applied in such a way that a province or...I'm trying to think of what other authority might be doing a cleanup, but maybe you folks have considered that, on the environmental side. A province has come forward and said it estimated the further cleanup to be such-and-such over so many years. Does clause 17 also capture forward going, or is it only what has already been done that can be compensated for?
On November 30th, 2009. See this statement in context.