Again, back to clause 17, some of the cleanup processes could take many years. If clause 17 is eventually limited later on in the act, is that what we mean by “reasonable”? Does “reasonable” have something to do with the timeline as much as it has to do with the size of compensation?
It seems a bit misleading. Clause 17 says that the government will allow this limited liability act to compensate people who do the cleanup. That leaves some assurance that the environment will be cleaned. Then later on in the act it says that it will only be for a couple of years or that we're going to limit the length of the thing. It seems to be not a false assurance, but.... Do you follow my meaning?