I won't cast aspersions, but is there not a way then to limit your costs, as a government, by not issuing as many cleanup orders as otherwise would be done? It seems like it's the fox watching the henhouse a bit. If the only way to have a cleanup happen.... Say the federal government deems it to be a worthwhile cleanup. That's the only way you can be compensated under the act. Is that correct?
On November 30th, 2009. See this statement in context.