Yes, we did think this was an improvement, because, as you say, our main interest was making this transparent. Because it's published in part II of the Canada Gazette, everyone is deemed to know about it. It's judicially noticed. It was actually important to publish it in part II of the Gazette because it's theoretically possible that some actions will have staggered along a certain distance, and they have to be stopped and everything has to go to the tribunal.
So it's to make sure that everybody knows the rules of the game and has a fair opportunity to comment.