I think we understand your question. We have to go back to the fundamental principle of the bill. As we've drafted it, the operator, under clause 4, doesn't get compensated. If you look at clauses 16 and 18, for instance, where there is compensation provided for lost wages in certain circumstances, it's always linked to property. Since the operator's property is excluded, they're out. That may seem harsh, but the point is that it is understood that the operator should make his own arrangements. That's outside the act. It's to ensure money is preserved for third-party victims.
On December 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.