No. Generally it would be something that was more concrete than that, more concrete than just a contract or its revenues from the sale of electricity. It would have to be some kind of an agreement that was provided to the government, that in the event of a nuclear incident, this money would be ring-fenced and would be available for the compensation of victims. The 50% is found in subclause 24(3).
On December 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.