Yes. There is provision later in the legislation for the development of regulations, and in those regulations the government is permitted to set an amount of reinsurance for classes of facility or installation. For a very large facility, such as a nuclear reactor, a Darlington, for example, there would be no government reinsurance. They would be expected to get the full $650 million of private insurance from an approved insurer; however, for a smaller facility, such as the reactors that you describe, there would be very significant amounts of reinsurance provided by the government, and those amounts would be established through regulation. So in fact the smaller facilities, such as Slowpoke reactors in universities, etc., the remote reactors you're suggesting, would have to get a very small amount of commercial insurance. A large amount would be reinsured by the federal government pursuant to the regulations.
On December 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.