This bill has obviously been to the House. It has been introduced here. Liberals wrote it, so I'm sure they think it's written as it should have been. It was brought forward. It was passed through the committee to the House as it is. The NDP have a history of treating this bill with—I don't know what word I should use, but they filibustered it last time when it got in the House in order to keep it from moving ahead.
I think when you spend two hours on one clause, asking the same questions again and again...it's hard for us to believe that Mr. Cullen isn't doing that again and that the point of what he has been debating and questioning isn't just to filibuster the bill and slow it down. If he's serious about wanting to sit down and talk about this, we can certainly do that, but the reality is, in the last three meetings he hasn't shown any inclination to treat the bill seriously, so we would have some serious issues with that.