It's an amendment we're not going to bring to this, but it sure would have been nice to reference such a group or reference an international standard or something. As it is written in black and white right now--and I understand terms change and groups and association names change--there must have been a way to better reassure the committee. With that much power given to the minister....
This whole thing is about proper insurance. Clause 25 reads that the minister simply has the power to designate whoever she'd like to be the insurer and to permit that insurance to go ahead. With the Government of Canada being the ultimate insurer of this whole thing in providing this limited liability, it's unfortunate, I suppose, that there isn't something given over.
I understand all you've said about this being that the minister will go forward and find a proper insurer, but it doesn't say so. When dealing with legislation, I always feel more reassured when it simply says what the actual intention is rather than give such powers away, if you follow me.