It's a question back to this tribunal in court. I want to understand whether subclauses 29(1) and (2) affect this at all. It doesn't bring any clarity to the notion, but I want to understand the language in this, and forgive me for not being a lawyer. It reads:
An action involving damage caused by a nuclear incident is to be brought in the court that has jurisdiction in the place where the incident occurs.
What happens with respect to a tribunal being named? Does it also wipe this out in terms of clause 29?