I have a couple of points I'd like to make. One is that there have been good reasons given why the $650 million was chosen. I think that's been explained by our witnesses. The NDP may not agree with that, but there's a good rationale in terms of the assessments that have been done and for the reality that it is an adequate figure.
The second thing I would like to point out is that there is actually a cost to the government should this limit be raised, because the government is reinsuring a number of these facilities. So every increase in the liability would certainly expose the government to higher costs than it has with the bill as it is. So I'd support your ruling that there needs to be a royal recommendation here, because it does expose the government to increased liability and the possibility of increased spending.