Thank you, Chair.
Following Mr. Cullen's point, doesn't that actually go back to the set-up of the nuclear claims tribunal, which is in clause 31? Because it very expressly says that it stops all proceedings that would have happened under a court process at that point in time, and then under clause 33 there's a report to Parliament:
The Minister shall, without delay after a declaration is made under section 31, cause a report estimating the cost of the damage arising from a nuclear incident to be laid before each House of Parliament.
So before the tribunal even really gets started, there's going to actually be a report made to Parliament with the broad scope of what we think the damages might be anyway, and the tribunal, as you appropriately pointed out, is going to be the way for us and for the claimants to get action a little faster.
So technically we're not coming in cold, and technically we're not coming in two-step. We're going to have an estimate of that before you can start. Is that not correct?