Thank you, Chair.
Mr. Tonks pointed out two very good things. One was the chair, obviously, and the other concerned the points he made with respect to the evidence we heard.
The other thing I would like to point out... And one could make an argument that this probably shouldn't be in order either, because if you look at it, “operator fails to prove...the liability...in subsection (1) is increased to three times that amount”, so indirectly you are taking your liability up to $1.95 billion, and any insurance company, when it assesses the risk, would probably say that the premiums would therefore increase, and you will see an escalating amount on that as well.
I would say I can't support it based on those two factors.