I have a last question on that. Is there potential for an individual, as part of the testimony that's brought forward, somebody from the nuclear supplier themselves, who claims the need for a private hearing on the tribunal because of personal implications that may be then later used in a court case? I'm just trying to ensure that privacy is used as little as possible under the definition that we have in clause 52. I don't want there to be any understanding that there is room out for the provider, for the electricity purchaser, for anybody to start to put some of these tribunals into a level of secrecy that's not intended by this notion of harming the individual. Do you follow my meaning?
I hear it's a stretch for a company to come forward. Is it a stretch for an individual from the company to say they want anything to do with issue X to be done in private at this tribunal level because their personal privacy interest outweighs that of the general public?