In subclause 56(3) there's something about hearing additional evidence on this appeal. In exceptional circumstances it's noted that more evidence can be brought. If somebody goes before one of these lower-form elements of the tribunal, is unsatisfied with it, finds more evidence, and gets another doctor's note, is that all considered exceptional evidence? Would the tribunal say, “I'm sorry, you didn't do your job in coming to the first one. We won't see your appeal. We see this as potentially vexatious”?
On December 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.