Last question on this. Just in legal terms, I know sometimes the word “reasonable” implies something. I'm trying to foresee a moment when we're not getting clogged up with disputing physicians as to what the effects of the accident were. Did the person have a pre-existing ailment? Was it something directly caused by...? Does “reasonable” implore the head of the tribunal in a certain direction?
On December 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.