I do.
Chair, it's not that I'm questioning your decision as much as I'm trying to understand the rationales for consequential amendments that are coming.
We didn't propose this under the suspicion it was out of order, because the spirit and intention of what the government did is to try to create a liability regime for the nuclear industry. That's what this bill is meant to do, create a particularly unique insurance form for the nuclear industry.
In terms of where that number is, whether it's $650 million or more, we understand that as staying within the spirit and recommendation--as I've seen committees do before--of what the bill is trying to do. We're just arguing where that limit is and whether it should be higher or lower.
So I'm not challenging your ruling in a formal way, but I'm trying to understand it so when we look through future amendments that we've moved we can understand where you're seeing the limit of amendments to be for this bill.