--talking about alternative financial security. Amendment NDP-16 talks about alternative financial security, so I don't understand how it's outside the purview of the bill if it's directly referenced in subclause 24(2).
Again, I don't claim expertise on how these financial systems work, but if the government's own bill said you can do this thing and we suggested a way to do it, I can understand the government maybe not liking it, but I don't see how it's out of order. That's my question.