Sorry, it's amendment NDP-16. We've tied these two things together, so I have to move back and forth between them.
If, on the fifth line down, after “23(1)”, it said, “to be held by the nuclear installation, the Minister may require an additional contribution...every year”, in the way we craft amendments, that wouldn't have mandated the minister to do it. It doesn't say “shall”. Would that have allowed amendment NDP-16 to be in order?