Well, new clause 27.1 is the amendment, but as you read through new clause 27.1, it references subclause 23(1). I was just trying to take committee members to the actual line. About five or six lines down, the word “shall” appears. If the concern from your legislative advice is that it's mandating something that has only been imagined in the bill, if we don't mandate it in a sense but say that this is an option for the minister to issue that type of reinsurance...
I very much hear Mr. Anderson's point about government being on the hook. I guess what's part of our effort here is that we're reducing government's liability; we're not increasing it. By setting the liability limit higher, the liability of the government is decreased by an equal amount, unless I'm reading the whole purpose of the bill wrong.
Did you follow my point there, Chair, in terms of--