Thanks to the parliamentary secretary for working on this amendment.
Just so folks have an understanding of what this is about before we get to a vote, as I indicated in my previous comments, this bill has some age on it and there's a need to have a review of where we're setting these limits and the exposure to Canadians. The question is also that the sale or reorganization--whatever you want to call it--of AECL is in the mix.
We believe that if this bill were to come into law, just under a year and a half later it would get reviewed. You'll see in a subsequent amendment the direction of that review. But with so much moving in the nuclear industry, in Canada in particular, but also globally, it seems necessary to have a first review quite expediently and make sure the assumptions that were made by committee members here and in the House eventually still hold correct. As you've noted, I have some doubts about liability regimes, limits, and compensation.
Again, I appreciate the work of the parliamentary secretary to make this amendment clearer and more precise for the committee.