No. If, for example, the liability were entirely covered by the government by reinsurance, for example, if one could anticipate that there was a loss that the insurers would not cover and therefore it fell to the government to provide total coverage, then that would be the full exposure of the government at the $75 million level. For example, if there were a reason that the insurance policy that is in place would not cover the damage and the federal reinsurance were implicated, then this assumes that reinsurance on each and every plant that is currently designated under the legislation. This is a very unlikely situation, so they are saying that the total exposure would be $1,050,000,000.
On December 9th, 2009. See this statement in context.