We've moved a number of amendments to this bill to help clarify what will and will not happen in the event of a nuclear accident. One of the things we're trying to understand is in terms of cross-border damage, in terms of all the liabilities. The government has claimed that under the study that was done in 2002, the liability regime of $650 million is adequate, having looked at Gentilly and another reactor.
What we're trying to establish here is more transparency in terms of the total liabilities in the event of a nuclear accident and what the government bases those liabilities on.
Do you follow me so far?
Where am I going sideways on this?