Thank you.
The savings vary according to the different projects and according to the different locations. But, as we were saying earlier, with respect to the project with Drake Landing, we are seeing savings pushing up to 100% on the space heating side of things. We're seeing similar potential savings in other environments, and it really depends on the approach that's taken and the target that is set by the individual community.
One of the things we're looking at in integrated community energy systems is allowing each community to set its own targets and to decide the important pieces, whether they want to focus on renewable energy, whether they want to focus on lowering carbon targets, whether electricity is the base case in a particular jurisdiction, or gas. All of these things have different implications.
As we talk about a road map for how we implement these things, the road map is not for individual communities, but more a means for them to decide how best to approach integrated community solutions for their specific circumstances.
Overall, though, as we heard earlier, communities are responsible for 50%-plus of the energy consumption in Canada. And we certainly see savings of 50% within the realm of reach in very short order, and significantly more become possible when you start thinking about renewable energy technologies and getting the synergies across the different systems, where you start using waste heat from different industrial facilities and that kind of thing—or we can get some real synergies and economic benefits at the local level. So there's lots of opportunity.
I think one of the big keys is understanding that each community will have different solutions, depending on their energy mix, building type, industry type, etc.