Yes. I think that's a good answer. It blends with what I was saying a little bit earlier about it being applicable to all towns, to single-industry towns, and to a town where the arena is the big energy user. In terms of density, even main street, small town Canada provides a certain amount of density for shared systems and shared opportunities.
A residential development that is in more of a suburban or rural sprawl type of development does become less amenable to community systems, simply because of infrastructure costs and because of losses in distributing heat and that sort of thing. It's still possible.
I think one of the messages with QUEST, though, is that if we're going to get serious about energy, we need to be really rethinking even how we lay out rural communities and that sort of thing, or finding the best technological solutions that bring us this integrated piece to create the energy savings you would get otherwise from different configurations.
One of the pieces about QUEST in looking at this is not more of the same, not more sprawl, and not more design of this nature without thinking about the energy consequences and how you're going to deal with this. A solar system with storage in the Okotoks example, in Drake Landing, is pretty suburban, but we're able to get 52 houses heated off a central system, so it's not out of the question. But it does say, “Let's rethink”--and that means rethink urban, rethink rural, rethink remote, and rethink suburbia, all of those pieces together.