If that's the case, then we should just give her an open invitation. There doesn't have to be anything attached to it at all.
I don't think Mr. Regan wants to completely change the direction of what Mr. Cullen has suggested here. I think that is a major amendment, and certainly if the minister's coming, she's going to want some specifics to talk about. We're already broadening this out, far broader than I think Mr. Cullen intended.
The other point I'd like to make, and probably I'll make a few more here later, is that she has already been here. The opposition asked us to bring her in and talk about supplementary Bs, and in there was funding for AECL and we had those questions. They've already been addressed. She was good enough to come immediately when we asked her.
So I think realistically this amendment should be defeated, and so should the motion, and we should move on with our planning for the future here.