I'll take this on to a certain degree. I want to make a couple of comments.
One, in my personal view--I won't speak for B.C. Hydro on this--the federal government's job is to enable. Part of enabling, I think, is to be strategic on how you use your funds. That means it might not be for every technology.
I think we have to look at what technologies are closer to commercialization than others. There is a spectrum. I know it might depend on who you talk to, but generally speaking, there is a recognition that solar will tend to be further out, as will fuel cells, but some of the biofuels and biodiesels and district energy systems are not that expensive.
I think one challenge is the payback. Developers and municipalities--in particular, municipalities--have a five- to seven-year payback period. They're bound by that. If they go to seven years, they have to have a referendum. Or they do in British Columbia; I don't know if that's true everywhere.
So that's a constraint. That's a barrier. For agricultural land, to develop a greenhouse and have a generator to capture the carbon dioxide and put it into the greenhouse, it means you have to change the agricultural land reserve zoning in B.C., and maybe in other jurisdictions. I think it highlights some of the barriers. Some of it is funding, and we do need some money, but I think it has to be strategically oriented. It is going to be different across the province. You can't give it to wind and think it's going to work everywhere, because it won't.
Again, I would re-emphasize that it's not one size fits all. It requires a longer-term view. I know that's challenging when you're in a four-year--