I want to concur with Mr. Cullen.
I've personally seen this happen in other committees, where people are constantly coming up with good ideas and trying to fill the hopper for what's going to happen next. But the reality is that in our work things change constantly, and you never know six weeks or eight weeks down the road if that priority that was just voted on is going to become the priority at the time.
So I'm prepared to support this, including the amendment, on the condition that this be one of the things we consider when we come to the end of our current study, and that at that time we evaluate all of the options that are available before we decide what our future agenda is going to be.