No. The fact that we didn't choose to go with what we call the Vancouver model, which when you look at the north shore of False Creek is the podium development with a point tower, was a decision made by the council at the time to actually create a more distinct neighbourhood without the same look. The density is very comparable. In terms of the number of units per acre, we've gone with more of a Berlin model, in which we have more 8-, 10-, and 12-storey buildings on the site instead of the high-rises. The heat load density, the amount of heat for customers, and therefore the sales concentrated in that area are the same. So the model will work.
The higher density you go, the more effective the economy is for these types of systems. In this example again, skyscrapers would work fine. We are actually doing some research now to look at converting the central heat system to a renewable source and to look at the viability of starting to hook up some of the existing downtown modes. Southeast False Creek, again, has quite a high density. East Fraserlands has slightly lower density, but the economics still worked out there.